← Back to Feed

New NatJack Attacks Hijack TCP Sessions and Spoof DNS by Manipulating NAT Tables

August 7, 2026 · The Hacker News · Severity: HIGH

This article describes NatJack, a new attack class that abuses assumptions in NAT implementations to hijack TCP sessions, spoof DNS, expose ports, and exhaust NAT tables. Researcher Malcolm Stagg presented findings at Black Hat USA 2026, with CVEs assigned for Windows and Linux implementations. No single patch exists, so organizations should apply updates and follow mitigation guidance.

Security researcher Malcolm Stagg has disclosed a new attack class called  NatJack  that manipulates network address translation (NAT) connection state to hijack active TCP sessions, spoof DNS responses, expose mapped ports, and exhaust NAT tables. Presented at Black Hat USA 2026 , the research found affected behavior across independently developed implementations, including Windows and Linux. Two implementation-specific flaws have been assigned CVEs:  CVE-2026-56181  (CVSS score: 8.3) in Windows NAT used by Hyper-V, and  CVE-2026-63913  (CVSS score: 8.2) in Linux Netfilter conntrack. NatJack generally requires the attacker to have privileged access to a system behind the same NAT as the victim. The mitigation guidance therefore emphasizes separating untrusted workloads from trusted systems that share NAT infrastructure. There is no single patch for the broader attack class. Organizations should apply available Windows and Linux updates and encrypt traffic even within internal networks. The research also recommends Internet Protocol (IP) Source Guard where applicable. The  NatJack research , conducted independently by Stagg through SODIUM-24, targets an assumption built into many NAT implementations: hosts behind the same NAT are generally assumed not to manipulate one another's connection state. An attacker controlling a system behind the same NAT can, depending on the implementation, manipulate connection-tracking entries belonging to another system. The research describes four main paths. One can redirect traffic from an active TCP connection by replacing its NAT mapping. Another interferes with a victim's DNS request so the legitimate DNS response reaches the attacker, allowing a forged response to be sent back. Other techniques disclose externally mapped ports or fill the NAT connection table with spoofed flows until legitimate clients cannot create new connections. Synack  said  Stagg tested the techniques against dozens of real-world network infrastructure products from multiple vendors and demonstrated proof-of-concept exploitation in a controlled environment. The NatJack site does not publish a complete product-by-product matrix. The Hacker News found no public evidence that NatJack techniques have been exploited in the wild as of August 7, 2026. For Linux, the  kernel.org CNA record  says a crafted SYN followed by a reset packet with an invalid sequence number can prematurely force an active Netfilter NAT entry into a closed state because the conntrack logic failed to validate its direction. Fixed stable releases include 5.10.259, 5.15.210, 6.1.176, 6.6.143, 6.12.93, 6.18.35, 7.0.12, and 7.1. Stagg says the kernel change fixes the code flaw but only mitigates the broader downstream-spoofing technique, increasing attack complexity rather than fully addressing it. Microsoft's  CNA record  describes the Windows issue as an origin-validation error that enables spoofing from an adjacent network. Affected releases include Windows 11 24H2 before 26100.8875, 25H2 before 26200.8875, 26H1 before 28000.2525, and Windows Server 2025 before 26100.33158. NatJack also builds on  earlier research into NAT-state manipulation . An  NDSS 2024 study  demonstrated TCP hijacking through NAT mapping manipulation and found 52 of 67 tested routers susceptible to its attack, work that produced ten CVEs. Found this article interesting? Follow us on Google News , Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.

Key Takeaways

  • NatJack attacks manipulate NAT connection state to hijack TCP sessions, spoof DNS, and exhaust tables.
  • CVE-2026-56181 affects Windows NAT and CVE-2026-63913 affects Linux Netfilter conntrack.
  • Mitigation emphasizes separating untrusted workloads, patching, encrypting internal traffic, and using IP Source Guard.
☕ Buy a Coffee